Reconciling Ministries logo

Asbury Reconciling Ministries Committee

After Asbury UMC became Reconciling November 17 of 2017 it was decided that we needed to ponder what it meant to be Reconciling. The minimum requirements are faily specific, you must have a statment of welcome which includes welcoming Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender people which is publically displayed. We informed
Reconciling Ministries Network and were
listed on their website as being Reconciling. It almost goes without saying that if this is your public deceleration you don't want to discourage LGBT people from attending services here. That is minimal. But just as wearing a cross does not make one a Christian, Being Reconciling is more then just the label. The Reconciling Ministries Committee was formed to help us think about how to make our values more apparent to ourselves, any visitor who may have been rejected elsewhere and to Asbury church. The first thing we did was publish and ad in the Delaware Gazette. The next thing was to setup a booth at First Friday. This page is one effort to make information available to those who seek it. Here are links and information about the many things that people are doing. If you find things that should be added or explained better, let us know.
Most Used
Back to edshome
Asbury Church Web page
Asbury Ad
King Avenue aggregator

Notes for Hanna Circle
GC general information
GC 2020 Aug. 29 - Sept. 7, 2021 in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Schedule and agenda
East Ohio Conference
West Ohio Conference
Searches
UM News Service
Discipline 2016 (free)
Tools
HTML Tags
Disicpline errata
Local Disicpline errata
UMC Demograpics
ADCA Vol 2/1
ADCA Vol 2/2
Web Links

Ohio 616 Don't say "Gay" bill
brief Summary
Actual Ohio Bill
New York Times article 1619 Project
UM insight on whos leaving
Marysville 83% vote to disafiliate 96% to join GMC

Is the UMC really ...?
B. Malone's Complete message
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
20% of Florida churches are sueing to leave the church.
Insurance is a big problem.

The UMC Yesterday Today and Tomorrow All sessions

UMC Overview
Episode 1
Episode 2
Episode 3
Episode 4
AlabamaWestFloridaReconciling AWFReconciling.com
AWF Resources


Bard/Jones Plan (Phil)
Plan Comparison
EO Combined Statement
Clergy Letter to Malone
Wisconson Sacred Resistance
Vison Welcoming Church
History of GC decisions
UM News Christmas covonent Plan
Christmas Covenent Sighnup
Taking over the UMC
Greater North-West GC
Organizations
RMN
Find A Reconciling Church
UM Queer Clergy
UMC-Next
( Kansas city (Progresives)
Hacking Christianity Jeremy Smith
UM Mainstream Interesting Statistics
Love Prevails

UM-Forward
UM Forward Home
Members
UMForward Lenten Gathering
Traditional orgs
Good news Magazine
Confesing Movement
IRD
Wesley Covenant
Global Methodist Church
Global GC in 12-18 months (from May 2022)
Global Transitional book of Doctrines and discipline

Insight On Delegates
Agreement on Seperation
Protocole of ... Seperation December 17, 2019
Protocal Legsilation
FAQ on Protocole
How was group formed?
Local copy Protocole
UM News Protocole Interview
UMNews comentary
West Ohio Dave Meridith, Greg Palmer,
EOC Presentation of Protocole

How was group formed?
COB press release
Karen Oliveto's comments
Disipline Paragraphs on Disaffiliation
� 2553, page 776.Section VIII. (Not in 2016 edition. Disaffiliation of Local Churches Over Issues Related to Human Sexuality
Varies by Annual Conference.
Needs to involve the DS: Rev. N�stor Nazario
Involves 2/3 of professing members present at a church conference.
Origionally set to expire in December 31, 2023. Conference may extend the time.
What to know about disafiliation
Discipline Paragraph 2553
Paragraph 2548.2. (not for congregation
Missinterpretation of 2548.2
Good News Words of reconciliation with no reference to Protocole ideas.
Good News Words of reconciliation with no reference to Protocole ideas.
UM Forward Response
Dave Meridith's Response
Love Prevails Response


Centering Resources
Audre Lorde
Power
James Baldwin
The Giver
Mary Howel
Mary Magdalene

Bill McCartney Passed this on.
The US Annual Conferences are complete and the backlash against the Wesleyan Covenant Association (WCA) and the Traditional Plan is unbelievable, even breathtaking. Fresh off General Conference 2019, with their signature legislation passed, the WCA organized in every annual conference to demonstrate they represent the US church. Fortunately, they published their preferred list of candidates so we can see how they did. Here are 5 takeaways:

  1. The WCA has lost the hearts and minds of the US Church.

    More than half of the annual conferences (28 of 54) passed resolutions in opposition to the Traditional Plan. Seventy-six percent (76%) of US annual conferences, (41 out of 54) voted for a majority non-WCA delegation. There is a super-majority in every US Jurisdiction of delegates against the Traditional Plan. In total, the WCA went from 35% US support in 2019 to around 26% for 2020. In other words, in 2019 the WCA was outnumbered with US delegates 2 to 1. Now, they are outnumbered almost 3 to 1! Just look at the percent of centrist/progressive delegates elected:
    • Western Jurisdiction 100%
    • North Central Jurisdiction 82%
    • Northeastern Jurisdiction 73%
    • South Central Jurisdiction 71%
    • Southeastern Jurisdiction 69%
    • US Totals 74%
    Click on the map link to see this reality in full color. Map of results

  2. The WCA has lost both Clergy and Lay representation.

    There is a strong narrative coming out of Good News and elsewhere that it is the clergy who are �liberal,� but the laity are still �conservative.� Not exactly, the WCA elected more laity than clergy, but the laity are not far behind. Remarkably, of the 241 clergy elected to GC 2020 we can count only 35 who support the WCA, less than 15%. And, by our count, the WCA elected only 37% of the lay delegates. If this is what �conservative� looks like, the WCA laity alone are still outnumbered 2 to 1 in the US.
  3. The WCA will not be electing any more Bishops.

    Episcopal candidates must receive 60% of the votes in their Jurisdiction to be elected Bishop. Every Jurisdiction in the United States elected more than 60% centrists and progressives�even in the Southeastern and South Central. There is no need to even negotiate with the WCA for electing Bishops. We have elected our last Bishop who promises 100 trials. With no Bishops to enforce the Traditional Plan, the Traditional Plan is dead.
  4. The Traditional Plan is�well�something else.

    How do you explain this backlash? The status quo of the last 50 years at General Conference has never generated the blowback we are seeing in the US church. That is because the Traditional Plan is a radical step beyond the status quo. I receive about 1 or 2 emails a month criticizing the use of �mean-spirited� to describe the Traditional Plan. (And a few expressing appreciation.) For the record, I have never described the supporters of the Traditional Plan as �mean-spirited,� only the plan itself. The lifeblood of the Traditional Plan is expelling Bishops, Annual Conferences, and LGBTQ clergy and their allies from the church through trials. Call the Traditional Plan whatever you want; the US church is not having it.
  5. The goal posts keep moving.

    The Annual Conferences in the US have flipped enough votes to change the outcome of the 2019 General Conference. But the US church will lose 22 more votes for GC 2020. Four of those are just going away; the total delegate count at GC 2020 will be 860 instead of the 864 in 2019. Of the remaining 18 from the US, 16 will go to Africa and 2 will go to the Philippines. In 2019, the Traditional Plan received 60% of its votes from outside the US. With an even stronger global showing, the Traditional Plan could pass again in 2020 by as few as a handful of votes.
That is the plan according to Rev. Forbes Matonga, West Zimbabwe delegate and WCA leader. He boasted recently in a UMNS article, �Africa is growing in membership as the USA is declining, this means Africa will determine the future of the UMC.� This cavalier attitude does not bode well for 76% of the US church.
So now what?
Well, we need your input. Mainstream UMC is conducting a grassroots survey about moving beyond the Traditional Plan. The survey addresses issues of US and global structure. If you have not already taken it, please do so today!
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/MainstreamUMC
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/MainstreamUMC

Also, please donate to our work, Inspiring a New Methodism: Donate

In Christ, Rev. Dr. Mark R. Holland
Executive Director,
Mainstream UMC The map of the US church is on our homepage. www.MainstreamUMC.com Here is a link to a summary of all 2019 US Annual Conference actions. https://mainstreamumc.com/documents/resources/2019-06-26SummaryUSAnnualConferencePetitions.pdf